Why would YouTube shut down Syrian channels if they’re not aligned with forces that oppose the wellbeing of Syria?

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-09-08/youtube-shuts-down-all-syrian-state-channels-idlib-assault-begins

When I was around 12/13 years old, I was in Brazil. The community where I lived had a lot of middle eastern people in residence. I already had been so indoctrinated by tv by then that I was a bit scared of them.  

I remember the first person who ever told me she was from Syria. She was extremely hospitable and I still hear from my friends from Brazil from time to time.  

When I was in Paris, during my college years, I was astonished at how unfriendly the French students were and I could hardly get one to acknowledge my existence. Many middle eastern people my own age would express sympathy and tell me they were treated as badly as I was being treated.

My point is: it is sickening that the powers that be are permitted by us to villify, frame and murder middle eastern people! 

False flags require copious amounts of deception and, to my knowledge, they are perfectly legal.

Are they no longer hiding that it’s just one false flag after another?

Correction: At least it appears the mods on reddit are still trying to hide that it’s apparently one false flag after another.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/syria-chemical-weapons-virginia-senator-richard-black-uk-mi6-assad-russia-a8529681.html?amp&utm_campaign=Echobox&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Twitter&__twitter_impression=true

Are major corporations owned by the government or is the government owned by major corporations?

A number of major internet businesses (or governments fronts who knows?) banned Alex Jones all at once. This put us freedom lovers in yet another double bind. Most of us have seen enough to conclude that Jones is some sort of puppet or shill. For whom? Well, lately, from what I’ve seen, Jones has been pumping out that the Muslims are the ones ruining everything. Something tells me the real answer is a bit more complex than that.

Please forgive me if I’m probably oversimplifying Jones’ message. I really don’t take him seriously.

Most of us shudder at this Orwellian move of all these “corporations” moving at once to silence (one of their own?) but people like me really aren’t going to complain that loudly because it looks like yet another psyop. The oligarchs seem to be pulling another one of their theatrical maneuvers. Just my opinion. I’m watching this show from the cheap seats and I really don’t have any inside knowledge - apart from what I hear in prayer. 

I found it interesting that reddit, which I regard as strangled by shadowy hands, downvoted the following post to -3. 

What is so objectionable about a person arguing EFFECTIVELY that the people are entitled to be treated as co-owners of the internet? 

Who could possibly vote (en masse) against that? 

These links are from the original post to back up the post author’s argument that the people have been crucial in funding the internet and that the people have a right to enjoy civil liberties on it.

https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/5839394

 https://subsidytracker.goodjobsfirst.org/prog.php?parent=&statesum=&fedsum=&major_industry_sum=&hq_id_sum=&company_op=starts&company=google&major_industry%5B%5D=&hq_id=&free_text=&subsidy_level=&subsidy_op=%3E&subsidy=&face_loan_op=%3E&face_loan=&subsidy_type%5B%5D=&sub_year%5B%5D=&state=&federal=

 https://subsidytracker.goodjobsfirst.org/prog.php?parent=&statesum=&fedsum=&major_industry_sum=&hq_id_sum=&company_op=starts&company=facebook&major_industry%5B%5D=&hq_id=&free_text=&subsidy_level=&subsidy_op=%3E&subsidy=&face_loan_op=%3E&face_loan=&subsidy_type%5B%5D=&sub_year%5B%5D=&state=&federal=

 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Internet

Dan says according to his gematria culture themes analysis, it’s been about the War of 1812.

I’ve been broadcasting about a war from 1812 these days that involved England - Napoleon’s campaign in Russia.

https://youtu.be/ZlkNbfHnTCE 

Here is a video that just so happened to recently come out about one of Dan’s major themes - the War of 1812. 

Somebody has started to make fun of my Napoleon readings on YouTube.

 https://youtu.be/JlU2geHdGf8

With Napoleon in Russia, Pages 335-340.

Napoleon explains how the real him is a softie and that Josephine took advantage of that.

I am reading aloud: With Napoleon in Russia. Then I plan on reading the memoirs of Napoleon’s valet Marchand at St. Helena. Then I will read (5 pages a day) the Memoirs of Hortense Bonaparte. All three writers are considered exceptionally honest. All three essentially lived with Napoleon. Then I plan to read Napoleon’s letters to Josephine. You will see that Napoleon is the same person in all of these accounts. I’m doing this because I believe this is important and that our whole present world-in-crisis comes out of this True story.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCvjF0Pgk_ChteHij-PSRh7g/playlist

Also available at:

soundcloud.com/thetanster

and at iTunes, just search Tanster.

https://youtu.be/gc0yxPEjd5Q

Huma Abedin parties in the Hamptons.

This (below) is an old picture of a supposed good Muslim girl from a very devout family.

Ben Szemkus saw her holding a clipboard at a recruitment to lure Yale girls into a “sex slave” cult. Lots of high ranking people including James Alefantis and David Brock were said to have been there.

It is interesting there’s so little media interest in ONE ASPECT of this story. David Brock is supposed to be involved in journalism, right?

 https://youtu.be/Jr6Va0Lm41I

The Clintons supposedly honeymooned in Haiti and they are believed to have participated in dark occult rituals.

How has this couple haunted public life this long when they are clearly out for themselves?

Why in a “democracy” can the people not get rid of blatant and shameless liars for decades and decades? 

If the answer is somehow because of witchcraft, we’re going to need to face this matter head on. 

http://www.abreureport.com/2016/11/wikileaks-exposes-clinton-obsession.html?m=1