Here is the spirit of deception in action. Here’s an example of the race baiting they like to do to divide the races.
Court professionals tend to have a serious issue with lawyers and clients who waste the court’s time with frivolous litigation.
If the unscrupulous behave without integrity in the legal arena, careers can be destroyed. Lawyers have a strict ethical code they must follow if they wish to continue being lawyers. They must perform due diligence to make sure they are initiating cases with actual merit and they mustn’t enable dishonest clients. If they fail to do the minimum for themselves and their clients, if they aid and abet their clients after the fact through harassing someone fighting for justice -
This should be interesting...
#precious #pomeranian thetanster.com
What are the repercussions for the plaintiff in a lawsuit who lies in their complaint? What relief is there for the defendant?
By Catherine Beale
Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires all lawyers to take basic steps to confirm that their client actually has a real lawsuit -- i.e., that they did not make the whole thing up.
If a plaintiff lies, the defendant has options.
Often, this points to Rule 11. Defendant writes a letter to plaintiff, explains that the complaint violates Rule 11 (for "frivolous litigation"), and threatens to file a motion with the court if the plaintiff doesn't do something about it, which is usually (a) withdraw the complaint or (b) remove the defendant's name from the caption or revise to defendant's satisfaction.
If the plaintiff's lawyer is sufficiently nervous, the required corrections are made. There is a 21-day "safe harbor" period for the lawyer to think about it and investigate the charge. But if the corrections are not made, the defendant files the Rule 11 motion and the judge evaluates the case, then decides on what if any sanctions will be issued.
Being accused of "frivolous litigation" -- the kind that wastes time over nothing -- is very serious. Blogger Bruce Nye, author of California's Remedy For Frivolous Litigation, talks an interesting blue streak about Rule 11.
There are other ways to handle this situation. State sanctions for instance -- one option. Another is a motion to strike, where the judge actually allows the movant to remove the objectionable language himself under Rule 24(a).
Earlier this month, superlawyer/Harvard professor Alan Dershowitz filed a Motion for Limited Intervention with the Florida federal court.
Prof. Dershowitz says the attorneys on the case failed in their duty to conduct due diligence before they filed their lawsuit, which accuses him btw along with Prince Andrew of carnal rendezvouses involving ex-con/billionaire/sex offender Jeffrey Epstein's harem of underage girls including the used-to-be-underage plaintiff Jane Doe. Dershowitz says that Miss Doe's legal team
proffers various salacious allegations as quotable tabloid fodder. Specifically naming Prof. Dershowitz, and identifying him as Mr. Epstein’s counsel, Plaintiffs’ counsel allege that Jane Doe #3 was “required” to have sexual relations with Prof. Dershowitz “on numerous occasions while she was a minor,” and, in addition, that Prof. Dershowitz was “an eyewitness to the sexual abuse of many other minors.”
When this story originally broke, the Royal Palace was reportedly aghast but responded with its usual reserve. Prof. Dershowitz on the other hand got on CNN and declared:
"The real villains are the lawyers, Paul Cassell, a former federal judge, and Brad Epstein, who filed this without doing any checking. If they had just checked the manifest, if they had just checked with me, if they had just checked with the witnesses, they would know not to fire this stinkball in court."
CNN's interview: Alan Dershowitz denies underage sex - CNN Video
Prof. Dershowitz insists he has "never met" the woman who filed the lawsuit, whom he called a "prostitute" with no credibility. Of the lawyers who threw his name into the complaint, he said, "I am seeking their disbarment."
So...
What are the repercussions for a plaintiff who lies in a complaint?
What relief is there for the defendant?
That's the repercussions for a plaintiff who lies in a complaint and the relief for the defendant -- if that defendant is Alan Dershowitz.
The Statue of Liberty is full of pagan symbolism. “She” even has broken chains. Some suggest that the broken chain represents freedom from God’s Law.
Watch the video below and you may see that the Statue of Liberty is not what you think it is.
If someone believes in freedom sincerely, then they will let other people do their thing and they will not oppress or murder.
Anyone who oppresses or murders does not really believe in freedom.
I do what I do because I am obeying the dictates of my spirit. I am bound by God’s Law and I very happy about it.
Whatever is done to me, I know where I’m going. There is no better way to live.
I was ripped off, deceived and tricked by a pair who come from oppressive countries.
They set up their deceptive scam in the US and they have been using the US court system to try and silence their opposition.
Many are complaining about them. We all have similar stories so -
WE ARE NOT LYING.
You know a story is True if it’s congruent. Not only is my story congruent with itself but my story is congruent with all the other disgruntled clients and our story is even congruent with the misery and suffering of the followers who still buy into the bs of this deceptive pair!
The guru says he’s a student of Hitler and he shows it by how he comports himself.
Is justice totally dead in the US?
Have the bad guys totally won?
It makes no difference if I say their name or not because to me they are a just a type, another example of the hand of darkness right there in plain sight for all to see.
The devil really has no new games. Some are more skilled at hiding it than others but if you’ve seen one diabolical puppet, you’ve pretty much seen them all.
I’ve seen thoroughly behind their masks.
They used to pretend I don’t exist and then one day MAGICALLY they wouldn’t leave me alone. I have the right to say honestly what I want on my platforms as they have the right to say what they want on theirs as long as it’s their opinion and/or it’s True.
That’s their recourse. Abusing the court system is not okay. Lying on a complaint and commiting perjury and signing that perjury IS NOT LEGAL. These are crimes in this country. These two act like they’re above the law. We’ll see.
All they had to do was leave me alone and I would’ve probably stopped writing about them. Now they’ve angered a lot of people who would’ve been less radicalized otherwise.
I have no way of knowing if everything in this video is True but it is well worth watching. Matt Lauer makes an appearance.