We are after the truth here. This post gives some good tips about searching for it.
https://www.napoleon-series.org/research/eyewitness/c_truth.html
A presumed agent (who just won’t stop trying to attach themself to my work) has been saying Hortense’s memoirs are not credible without any proof whatsoever. This site agrees with us that Hortense is highly credible.
Napoleon did essentially force Hortense into an unhappy marriage. Napoleon forced her to become a Bonaparte. Then he gave her the rank of Queen soon thereafter. He also made her son the heir of his empire. She asked for none of these things and actually did not even want them. These facts alone SAY A LOT.
My whole project is really about the mystery of Napoleon and Hortense. There is something very important here.
Constant’s memoirs have been judged unreliable by the site we are highlighting in this post. Though I do see the Emperor in Constant’s memoirs, I AGREE. They are not reliable.
