The Information War and me
I was taken advantage of when I was younger by a big shot in media. I should’ve known better but I really was too young to know better. This happens all the time and it is wrong and these creeps really should be called out. His name is Roger Rosenblatt.
Part of why Matt Lauer irritated me that day was because he reminded me so very much of Rosenblatt.
Looking back, Rosenblatt seemed a bit jealous of Matt Lauer. True story.
It was through the devastation of the aftermath of the situation with Rosenblatt that I came to learn a term so central to this project: Narcissism.
We’re brainwashed that success is everything. Then when someone with “success” comes around we’re very inclined to be compliant when they dangle the carrot of “help”. In the end, the target is destroyed - left further incapable of trust and seeing humanity as good. It’s subversion on the macro scale, all set up to lure prey to those who have their worst interests in mind.
People Hortense de Beauharnais Bonaparte didn’t like: Monsieur Decazes
In Hortense’s Memoirs, the very handsome Monsieur Decazes entered Hortense’s life crying about his recently deceased wife, wanting a job.
Next thing, the Murat household (as Hortense put it) were implying that Hortense and Monsieur Decazes were engaged in an affair.
Hortense writes:
“At last I became impatient with him [Decazes] for his evasions. On the other hand, how could I suspect the motives of Monsieur Decazes? I had only known him when bowed down with grief over the loss of his wife. Tears always make one think well of the person who sheds them. What reasons had I for believing that the sorrow of a stricken husband was a mask to conceal the vanity of a coxcomb?
“Being still young I had not lost faith in the existence of frankness and loyalty. A too justifiable distrust of human nature had not yet made me critical and suspicious of people's motives. Moreover, Monsieur Decazes as a member of my husband's household must have known the King's character and been aware of our domestic difficulties, nor could there be any doubt that, like all Frenchmen living in Holland, he realized it was I who was in the right.
“My misfortunes made everyone sympathize with me, and the public hesitated to condemn my behavior. In order to banish all doubts from my mind I thought it necessary to inform Monsieur Decazes of the remarks that were attributed to him. I expected that he would be deeply pained at such gossip.
“He defended himself more or less vigorously, but when he realized that people might believe he had enjoyed my favors for even a short time, a satisfied smile showed that his vanity was rather flattered, and betrayed the true character of a man whom I had considered honorable simply because he happened to be in distress.”
Hortense explains further in her memoirs how she feels that Decazes was part of the chief of police Fouché’s ongoing efforts to get rid of her mother Josephine. Making up a story that Hortense was fooling around was calculated to drive a wedge between Napoleon and Hortense (and her mother). Later in Hortense’s Memoirs, we see Tzar Alexander make every effort to try and charm Hortense away from her devotion to Napoleon.
Was Decazes playing a role beyond just being a jerky guy?
Later in the memoirs, after the abdication of Napoleon, we learn that somehow Decazes goes straight to the top and becomes the favorite of King Louis the 18th when the foreign powers install him on the French throne.
That happens.
Then we learn in a totally different memoir, that of the supremely upright and honest Lavalette, that Decazes was central in trying to get him, an innocent man, executed.
It’s fairly obvious that the members of Napoleon’s family were inundated with troublemakers.
Decazes went on to become the French Prime Minister and the French Ambassador to England. De Flahaut, who we have recently featured in this series also became Ambassador to England. Just a coincidence that seems worth noting.
The larger story is available here.
How to deal with difficult people.
Now Quora is getting into the habit of censoring me
It looks like someone or some group really doesn’t like what I have to say about Napoleon. Isn’t it interesting? Who would want to control what a person says about history? I do what I do and the reaction reveals the rest. The censorship only shows what’s really going on. Thank you censors for showing the truth once more. My numbers on Quora also just so happened to get slashed. The hidden hand at work.
What’s Aquarius all about?
Aquarius is ruled by Uranus. It’s technological and quirky. It’s a cerebral air sign, idealistic and looking out for the community. Aquarius is modern and it doesn’t sell out. What else can we find out?
For more pertaining to the above, click here. What is the Aquarius personality?
For more from the site shown above, click here.
The red arrow above shows Aquarius in my natal chart. If you’d like to find where your Aquarius is in your natal chart, try astro.com Jupiter is in Aquarius above. What does that mean?
For more about Jupiter in Aquarius, click here. Aquarius’ cusp is in the 10th house. What does that mean?
For more, click here. Aquarius also takes up space in the 11tth house. What does that mean?
For more, click here. Jupiter in Aquarius is also part of my yod, which is supposed to be a collection of aspects that point to my destiny. I don’t fully understand it yet but I’ll show what it looks like. Supposedly the yod is a powerful conduit of energy focused at a certain point - in my case Saturn (father/institutions) in Cancer (home) in the 3rd (communications) house.
It looks to me as if the Moon, Jupiter, Venus, Neptune, Mercury, the Sun, Uranus and Pluto are all focused on that Saturn in Cancer in the 3rd house. The natal Saturn that seems so important in this chart is also retrograde. Let’s look at a few words about that.
For more, click here. Can this Saturn retrograde Cancer be alluding to the abuse in my childhood that messed me up a great deal? Can the energy of all these planets overcome that damage?
About this look into Aquarius: I’ve been really different my entire life. I’m doing a community project that fights for truth and freedom. It looks like Aquarius is fairly significant in this chart.
Check out this song to learn more.
The Astrology Series so far is available here.
Memoirs of Savary about Napoleon, Book 2, Part 1, 140-173
Napoleon had no clue what to do about Spain.
https://www.thetanster.com/blog/2019/2/11/napoleon-memoirs-links
An Astrological Cheat Sheet
Was Napoleon used to help fulfill the aims of a predatory group?
I’ve been trying to do good in a big way since 9/2014. I started painting rainbow art and I’d give it away on the streets of my area. Very quickly the police were sent to my house.
The local police were obligated to comply with a person in government who was infuriated with my giving art away on the streets in my area.
That was the beginning of how I became a magnet for this type of negative person who just has to stop something positive happening. I continued anyway.
Then I became the target of a new age conman who did everything possible to destroy me - in a way where it would be a bit difficult to call him out about it. This resulted in a lawsuit where he sued me in an attempt to silence me.
Then after that, I came upon a whistleblower saying he saw various politicians recruiting for a sex slave cult. I felt guided to hire a highly credible polygraph expert to test this whistleblower’s story.
That’s when all my new internet friends showed up wanting to help me, with strong ideas on the direction my project should take. They wanted me to present Donald Trump as a savior. They wanted me to laud Adolf Hitler. They wanted me to fight with shills on youtube. They wanted me to stop talking about the sex change situation involving children that appears to be going on. They wanted me to put disgusting violent stories on my blog. I could go on but essentially they wanted me to be guided out of obligation to their “friendship” to destroy myself and my work.
I get so many clever traps like this even now that I just do what I can to show what they are doing. It’s done in such a sneaky way that it really is difficult to SHOW what is really happening. If I can, I do my best to demonstrate the pattern of behavior.
For example, go to the Napoleon subreddit I run, see how quickly things get downvoted. It’s as if there are people there just waiting to downvote there. Sounds crazy, right? Test it yourself.
My project is wholly funded by myself and I offer free education. That’s nice, right? Yet my Wikipedia entry was taken down. Somebody took that Wikipedia down. Who took it down? Isn’t Wikipedia supposed to be by and for the people? I guess that’s all a ruse of some sort.
I’m spelling all this out because the terrible people operate in the shadows and they hide their names.
The story of Napoleon has been horrifically twisted by somebody - who knows who?
Since I know how the dark side operates and I’m broadcasting Napoleon memoirs, the whole story is starting to look like Napoleon vs. the Infiltrators.
If there is really an “order out of chaos” group - they need revolution so they can come in after and establish order with their puppets in charge.
The memoirs of Lavalette show that the French Revolution was fomented. Who fomented it? Who benefited? Then a government was installed. Who installed them?
Napoleon was trying to do his thing while this new government, the Directory, were in charge. They were so bad for France that Napoleon kicked them out and took over.
After this, Napoleon was drawn into one war after another for 15 years. Once they finally got rid of Napoleon, the vultures came in and carved up a lot of the world for themselves.
Therefore it is possible that Napoleon was highly manipulated by a group who used him to help them raze Europe so that they could turn it into what it has become.
I invite you to judge for yourself:
https://www.thetanster.com/blog/2019/2/11/napoleon-memoirs-links
